Friday, August 26, 2005

Speaking in Code...

A year ago, before she left her job to be a full-time mother, my wife was at a trade show in Dallas. She was at dinner with some clients. She mentioned that her husband (me) was a part-time pastor at our church.

So this woman next to her says, "Have you read The DaVinci Code?"

To which my wife says, "Actually, no. But I've heard a little bit about it."

At this point, the book had been out for a few months. My wife hadn't read the book, didn't know what the book said, or even a vague sense of the general plot.

The woman leans over to her and says, "Well, I just want you to consider it. Just consider it."

Nicole looked at her. "Consider...reading it?" she asked.

"No," the lady continued. "Just keep an open-mind while reading it. Just...consider it. Just consider it."

She kept saying that - "Just consider it" - which started to irritate my wife. When she got back, we were on a hike and she was re-telling the story to me.

"Consider what? What am I supposed to consider."

Now, before I go much further, I have to admit that I haven't read more than 10 pages of the novel. But I've read enough about it to sort of know the general plot - which, as I understand it, is basically the plot of "National Treasure". But what my wife was supposed to consider was Brown's theory that the story of Jesus Christ was made up by a bunch of guys who wanted political power at the Council of Nicea in 325. The real Jesus was just a guy who said some cool things, then married Mary Magdelene, and had a bunch of kids who went to France and became kings and knights.

So, in one fell swoop, Brown attacks the legitimacy of Western and Christian history. Which is no small tower to topple.

Here's why it bothers me. Because people believe it.

Yesterday in my AP English class, I had a student, a bright girl who is a star on the basketball team, who said something that bothered me. I was talking about the purpose of literature, and how it's never written so that students can later study it. It's written because the author has something burning in his or her heart that needs to be told. A story. A theme. An idea. Authors want to say something about their world. And that's why they write. And literature works best when we come away feeling as though we've learned something about our world.

To which this girl said, "That's the way I felt when I read The DaVinci Code."

Now, I don't know what she meant by that. But my sinking feeling is that she felt as though she were reading real history. Real history that finally made sense to her.

How do you deal with that, as a devoted follower of Christ?

I ask because the question is only getting stronger. Ron Howard is making a movie of the book, set for release next summer. It stars Tom Hanks. And folks are going to be asking and wondering.

What to do? I welcome any suggestions.

2 Comments:

Blogger Missy said...

During the previous semester, a class I took spent a couple days discussing Da Vinci Code (DVC) by Dan Brown. A group of students was responsible for researching and responding to the book, and after their presentation to the class, our prof gave us his scholarly input. Here's a collaboration of all that info I took in.

Brown makes the following statements or assumptions in DVC:
-The Bible is a product of man, not God, and has evolved through translations, additions, and revisions. History has never had a definitive version of the book. (p231)
-More than 80 gospels were considered for the NT, but only a few were chosen for inclusion (p231)
-Constantine chose Christianity for political reasons, wanting to back the winning horse to unify Rome. (p232)
-Constantine initiated Council of Nicea, at which the divinity of Jesus was proposed, debated, and voted on. Jesus' divine status was established by "a relatively close vote." (p233)
-Constantine enforced the inclusion of the gospels that made Christ godlike, doing away with those that spoke of his human traits and deeming heretic anyone who chose the forbidden gospels. (p234)
-The Roman Catholic church has tried to suppress the release of Dead Sea Scrolls & Coptic Scrolls at Nag Hammadi, which confirm “that the modern Bible was… edited by men who possessed a political agenda – to promote the divinity of the man Jesus Christ and use His influence to solidify their own power base.” (p234)
-Jesus was actually married to Mary Magdalene (p245) and intended to build his church upon her rather than Peter (p248). And “the greatest cover-up in human history” is that Jesus had a child through Mary, establishing a royal bloodline (249).
-The Crusades were partly about destroying evidence of Jesus’ marriage (254).
-This secret has been known and secretly told down through history in the works of Da Vinci, Mozart, Victor Hugo, Masonic symbolism, and Walt Disney (261-2).

To address these assumptions, let me first clarify that the gospels Brown refers to are those we call today “Gnostic Gospels.”

Problems with Brown’s understanding of the canon:
-There is no evidence of Gnosticism in the 1st century… as early as it would need to exist to support these claims.
-There’s no evidence of or reference to non-canonical gospels in the 1st century.
-NT books are quoted, referred to, written about, and preached on by church fathers as scriptural.
-No Gnostic writings are ever mentioned as authoritative by any church fathers.
-the Gnostic gospels do not present a “divine feminine” as Brown argues.
-The canonical gospels are consistent with the Hebrew Bible with hundreds of quotations and allusions.
-The Gnostic writings are so incongruous with the Hebrew Bible that they were rejected altogether.
-The canon was not established through a “vote” at Nicea, and Constantine did not weild the ecclesiastical authority Brown claims.

Those are issues with the canon itself. Essentially, to quote the conclusion of my prof, “For Brown’s thesis to work, some small, conspiratorial group would have had to remove dozens of canonical books from each of the manuscript copying centers, plus all the copies that had already been disseminated for the previous three centuries (including the other language groups that would have been translated), plus silence everyone who knew of their existence, eliminate every reference to them from the early [church fathers], and then keep this secret from the public, despite the best efforts of a core group of believers who wanted others to know their “Gnostic” truth, up until the manuscript discoveries at Nag Hammadi in 1945 (the only surviving trace of the “real” Bible.) Putting it mildly, this is a tremendous leap of credulity.”

See Dave, for DVC’s portrayal of Jesus to stand up, the claims regarding the canon and other information supporting that portrayal have to be accurate. And they simply are not.

Hope this gives you some thoughts to work with.

8:48 AM

 
Blogger David Tieche said...

Missy,

I'm so glad you're in school. To do otherwise with that brain would be folly.

As Dan Qualye once said, "A mind is a terrible thing to lose."

DAT

9:54 AM

 

Post a Comment

<< Home